LoadingLoading
Systematic sampling is a probability sampling method in which sample members are selected from a larger population based on a random starting point but at fixed periodic intervals.
Systematic sampling is a probability sampling method in which sample members are selected from a larger population based on a random starting point but at fixed periodic intervals. This sampling interval is calculated by dividing the population size by the desired sample size.
When performed correctly on large populations of defined sizes, systematic sampling can help researchers (including marketing and sales professionals) obtain representative findings of large populations without having to reach every individual.
Because simple random sampling of a population can be inefficient and time-consuming, statisticians turn to other methods, such as systematic sampling. Selecting sample size can be done quickly through a systematic approach. Once a fixed starting point was determined, a constant interval was chosen to facilitate participant selection.
Systematic sampling is preferred over simple random sampling when the risk of data manipulation is low. If there is a high risk that the researcher can manipulate the interval length to obtain the desired results, then a simple random sampling technique would be more appropriate.
Systematic sampling is popular among researchers and analysts because of its simplicity. Researchers usually assume that the results are representative of the majority normal population, unless random features are disproportionately present in every nth data sample (an unlikely occurrence). In other words, the population needs to exhibit a certain degree of natural randomness as well as the chosen indicator. If the population has some standardized pattern, the risk of accidentally selecting very common cases is even more apparent.
In systematic sampling, as in other sampling methods, the target population must be selected before participants are selected. A population can be identified based on any number of desired characteristics appropriate to the purpose of the study being conducted. Some selection criteria may include age, gender, location, education, or occupation.
IMPORTANT: There are several ways to sample a population for statistical inference. Systematic sampling is a form of random sampling.
One situation in which systematic sampling is best suited is when the population under study exhibits a degree of order or regularity. For example, if you are conducting a survey of customers entering a store, systematic sampling allows you to systematically select every nth customer, ensuring representation at different times of the day or week. This approach helps avoid bias caused by selecting only customers who arrive during a specific time period.
Another situation where systematic sampling is appropriate is when the size of the population is known and relatively large. Systematic sampling simplifies the process by eliminating the need to list and randomly select individuals from the entire population, but instead selects samples at a set pace. This is particularly useful in large-scale studies where time and resources are limited, meaning you don't have to put a lot of effort into planning your sample.
Systematic sampling is used when a researcher wants to ensure that the sample is evenly distributed throughout the population. For example, a company could select every nth person from a company directory filtered by last name. Other forms of sampling may accidentally cluster similar groups (i.e., over-selecting people from the finance department based on how the sample is aggregated).
In addition, compared with other sampling methods, systematic sampling has the advantage of being simple and easy to implement. It requires minimal computation and can be easily performed using simple algorithms, especially when the target sample size and total population size are known.
You can use the following steps to create a system sample: 1
As a hypothetical example of systematic sampling, suppose that in a population of 10,000 people, a statistician selects every 100 people to sample. Sampling intervals can also be systematic, such as choosing to draw a new sample every 12 hours.
As another example, if you wanted to use systematic sampling to select a random group of 1,000 people from a population of 50,000, you would have to put all potential participants on a list and choose a starting point. Once the list is formed, every 50 people on the list (counting from the selected starting point) will be selected as participants because 50,000 ÷ 1,000 = 50.
For example, if the selected starting point is 20, select the 60th person on the list, then the 120th person, and so on. Once the end of the list is reached and additional participants are needed, the count will loop to the beginning of the list to complete the count.
Note: To conduct systematic sampling, the researcher must first know the size of the target population.
Generally speaking, there are three ways to generate system samples:
This is a classic form of systematic sampling in which subjects are selected at predetermined intervals. For example, if a researcher wanted to select a sample of 100 students from a population of 1,000 students, they could use systematic random sampling to select every 10th student from a list ordered in random order. This method ensures that every member of the population has an equal chance of being selected, while still maintaining a systematic sampling pattern.
Instead of randomly selecting the sampling interval, this creates a skip pattern along a linear path. This means that instead of selecting every nth member from the population, the selection process follows a predetermined sequence, such as selecting every 5th member, then every 7th member, then every 9th member, and so on. Linear system sampling can be useful in situations where there is a specific order or sequence along a linear path, such as geographical locations along a linear path.
This means that the sample starts again from the same point after it ends. This means that once the sampling interval reaches the last member of the population, it wraps around to the beginning and continues the selection process. Circular system sampling is typically used when the population exhibits a cyclic pattern or has no clear start or end point. For example, if researchers are studying tree growth in a forest, they can use circular system sampling to ensure complete coverage of the forest area by selecting trees at regular intervals along a circular path.
Systematic sampling and cluster sampling differ in how sample points are drawn from the population included in the sample. Cluster sampling breaks the population into clusters, while systematic sampling uses fixed intervals from a larger population to create samples.
Systematic sampling selects a random starting point from the population and then draws samples from the population at regular fixed intervals, depending on the size of the population. Cluster sampling divides the population into clusters and then draws a simple random sample from each cluster.
Cluster sampling is considered less precise than other sampling methods. However, it saves the cost of obtaining samples. Cluster sampling is a two-step sampling procedure. Use this when completing the entire overall list is difficult. For example, it is difficult to construct an entire population of grocery store customers for interviews.
However, one can create a random subset of stores, which is the first step in the process. The second step is to interview a random sample of these store customers. This is a simple manual process that saves time and money.
A common pitfall when using systematic sampling is choosing an inappropriate sampling interval. Choosing a sampling interval that is too small may result in oversampling and increased sampling error, while choosing an interval that is too large may result in undersampling and a less representative sample. This error can be avoided by fully understanding the full extent of the population before starting to sample.
Another mistake to avoid is failing to consider the potential bias that the sampling frame may introduce. Systematic sampling may lead to biased results if the sampling frame is not representative of the population of interest. For example, if the sampling frame only includes individuals from certain demographic groups or geographic locations, the sample will not reflect the diversity of the entire group. This type of error exists in all forms of sampling.
Another tip to note is to consider whether there are systematic patterns or cycles in the population. If there are periodic patterns or trends in the population that align with the sampling interval, some parts of the population may be systematically over- or under-represented. For example, imagine selecting a random player from a baseball roster. If these rosters were listed in positional order, you might end up selecting players at the same position from different teams because the population has a recurring pattern.
One risk that statisticians must consider when conducting systematic sampling involves the organization of the lists used with the sampling intervals. If the population placed on the list is organized in a cyclic pattern that matches the sampling interval, the selected sample may be biased.
For example, a company's human resources department wants to select a sample of employees and ask them what they think about company policies. Employees are divided into teams of 20, each led by a manager. If the list used to select the sample size is organized by teams clustered together, the statistician may run the risk of selecting only managers (or no managers at all), depending on the sampling interval.
To conduct systematic sampling, first, determine the size of the total population from which you want to sample. Then, a random starting point is chosen and every nth member is selected from the population based on a predetermined sampling interval.
You should use systematic sampling when you need a simple and efficient way to select a representative sample from a large population with a known and uniformly distributed structure, and when randomization is not feasible or necessary for your research goals.
Systematic sampling is easy to conduct and easy to understand, which is why it is often preferred by researchers. The central assumption that the results represent a mostly normal population guarantees uniform sampling of the entire population.
Additionally, because of its process, systematic sampling provides a higher degree of control than other sampling methods. Systematic sampling also has a lower risk factor because there is little chance of data contamination.
The main disadvantage of systematic sampling is the need for population size. Systematic sampling does not work well without knowing the exact number of participants in the population. For example, if a statistician wanted to examine the ages of homeless people in a specific area but couldn't get exactly how many homeless people there were, they wouldn't have a population size or starting point. Another disadvantage is that the population needs to exhibit a certain amount of natural randomness, otherwise the risk of selecting similar instances increases, thereby defeating the purpose of the sample.
Cluster sampling and systematic sampling differ in how sample points are drawn from the population included in the sample. Cluster sampling divides the population into clusters and then draws a simple random sample from each cluster. Systematic sampling selects a random starting point from the population and then draws samples from the population at regular fixed intervals, depending on the size of the population. Cluster sampling is more prone to larger sampling errors than systematic sampling, although it may be a cheaper process.
Sampling can be an effective way to draw conclusions about a large group of people, objects, or other things of interest. Systematic sampling is one of the most popular ways to achieve this because it is cheaper and less time-consuming than other options. Yes, it's not perfect. However, if you have a large data set with no patterns between intervals, systematic sampling can provide reliable samples at relatively low cost.
[1] PennState, Eberly College of Science. "STAT 506: Sampling Theory and Methods; 8.1 - Systematic Sampling."
TheQuantHackers is a cutting-edge community composed of a group of people from the world's top universities and quantitative finance practitioners, dedicated to exploring the infinite possibilities in the fields of artificial intelligence (AI) and quantification (Quant). Our team members come from world-renowned universities such as the University of Cambridge, Oxford University, Harvard University, ETH Zurich, Peking University, and the University of Science and Technology of China. Our external consultants come from first-class companies such as Microsoft, HSBC, Citadel, Man Group, Citi, Jump Trading, and top domestic private equity companies.
Upgrade to unlock all institutional-grade algorithms, derivative pricing engines, factor backtesting frameworks, and live QuantLab execution.
Explore Membership Access
Pre-order · £490Quantitative analytics platform
Waitlist closed — signal locked. Pre-order TQH TERMINAL now at £490 with launch-day delivery.